Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Artistic freedom should be defended

By Lisa Singh - posted Thursday, 20 March 2014


If there were any doubts that the conduct of the Minister for the Arts had entered the realm of the indefensible, he dispelled them in an interview on national radio when he talked to Fran Kelly on ABC on the morning of Friday 14 March. When asked whether his position would go to the extremes of forcing artists to accept funding from companies to which they objected such as those in the tobacco industry, businesses which the Labor party has decided are inappropriate sources of donations, the Minister stated:

I myself don’t think arts companies should reject bona fide arts sponsorship from commercially sound prospective partners on political grounds.

The implication of this is that the Minister for the Arts becomes an enforcer for ethically dubious organisations in their efforts to assert control over the arts. They will be encouraged to make arts organisations offers they can’t refuse, and if they do reject them the Minister will be standing by to change their minds.

Advertisement

Losing artistic independence

Threatening arts organisations with cuts to their funding if they do not toe the party line is a direct and open challenge to artists everywhere, exposing them to the removal of the funding they receive and have to live upon if they say things in their work that their sponsors do not like, or they conduct themselves in ways which the Minister does not approve. While this may have directly harmful effects on particular artists targeted under this policy, it will also have more widespread, deadening effects on artistic production across the nation. Self-censorship, as cultural producers start to stop expressing themselves and addressing issues in ways which might endanger corporate interests, will grow.

This view of the arts sees it not as an important community good, benefitting the public as an essential part of social, cultural and political discussion and aesthetic exchange, but as an addendum to corporate interests: it exists to legitimise and justify the activities of large businesses, and the aims of the arts must be bent to concord with those of its major corporate sponsors.

The irony is that this major attack on the freedom of expression of cultural producers is coming from a person who has claimed to have its defence as his raison d’etre and his goal as the nation’s attorney general. The hypocrisy of the Attorney in claiming to defend freedom of expression and advance the interests of artists and others to say what they want in the public sphere on the one hand, while moving to undermine artistic autonomy on the other and police the sponsorship agreements of artists, is nothing short of breathtaking.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Senator Lisa Singh is Shadow Parliamentary Secretary for the Environment, Climate Change and Water and prior to this was Shadow Parliamentary Secretary to the Shadow Attorney General. She was also a Minister in the Tasmanian Labor Government.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Lisa Singh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Lisa Singh
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy