Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Compare the pair: politics and public policy in Tasmania and the ACT

By Brendan O'Reilly - posted Tuesday, 11 March 2014


Perhaps the main thing that both Labor/Greens governments have in common is that they like to spend.

It was recently announced that the ACT's budget deficit has blown out by another $107 million, takingthe deficit from $253.6 million to $360.6 million. If forecasts can be believed (despite continuing and deep cuts to the APS affecting the ACT economy), the outlook is supposed to improve from next year, with the budget deficit falling to $109.5 million, then to $20.5 million in 2015-16 and then a modest $11.2 million surplus in 2016-17.

Tasmania's Net Operating Balance has been progressively deteriorating since 2003-04. The recent mid-year financial report showed a deterioration since the Budget was handed down and that the budget forecast has taken a $450 million hit over the next four years. The Tasmanian Government has been forced to scrap plans to get the budget into surplus by 2016-17. The forecast deficit for this financial year of $267 million has blown out by more than $100 million. It is now expected to be at least $376 million, $50 million more than last year's deficit.

Advertisement

It can be argued that the future of the ACT economy will be determined more by decisions of the Australian Government than those of the Territory Government because of the dominance the APS bureaucracy in Territory employment. This may be just as well, given the current focus of the ACT Government on "progressive" issues. Also, given that ACT residents have the highest disposable incomes in the country, the Territory Government also has a better than average capacity to raise taxes.

Tasmania, being less affluent and dependent on the private sector for most of its economic activity, is in a different position. In the face of deteriorating market conditions for some of its traditional industries, Tasmania is said to have bred social attitudes that block many new development proposals that could help turn its economy around. Problems and challenges are said to get debated endlessly, with no resolution.

The ill-fated Gunn's Ltd pump mill proposal, which offered a higher value-added alternative to export wood chips, is illustrative. That proposal, as well as virtually any proposal involving Tasmanian timber, was targeted by the extreme Tasmanian Green movement. They seem to view eco-tourism and renewable energy (excepting a dam affecting the Franklin River) as the panacea for all the state's economic woes. It was not so much the opposition to building the pulp mill outside Launceston that damaged Tasmania's reputation. It was the determined opposition of these groups that it not be built anywhere in the State. Such extreme reaction, I believe, has left many business people unprepared to invest even two bob in Tasmania.

If Tasmania is to raise itself from the bottom of the economic and social league tables, its Government needs to seek out and embrace its development opportunities, and can't afford to be overly choosy in this regard. This looks likely to happen via a change in Government, which might also induce Tasmanian Labor to reinvent itself.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

1 post so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Brendan O’Reilly is a retired commonwealth public servant with a background in economics and accounting. He is currently pursuing private business interests.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Brendan O'Reilly

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 1 comment
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy