Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Not us, not here, not now

By Rodney Croome - posted Friday, 1 November 2013


The Australian marriage equality debate will be remembered as a litany of ever weaker excuses for inaction.

NSW Premier Barry O'Farrell has given us one of the weakest of all: "national consistency".

O'Farrell, an in-principle supporter of marriage equality, has said he will not support a NSW Same-Sex Marriage Bill because "I don't want to see a return to the patchwork quilt of marriage laws that existed in the 1950s".

Advertisement

He believes "true equality" for all Australian couples can only be delivered by the federal government.

He's right that marriage equality at a national level will cover all couples.

But the federal government is at best indifferent to progressing the reform, with some key government figures deeply antagonistic.

In this situation the states have a moral responsibility to take action instead.

To put "national consistency" and "true equality" ahead of the inclusion, protection and dignity that comes with allowing same-sex couples to marry verges on callous.

It traps same-sex couples in a cul-de-sac of non-recognition built in the name of their best interest.

Advertisement

It's tantamount to saying "not us, not here, not now".

It also shows a profound misunderstanding of the purpose and history of Australian federalism.

The reason we are a federal nation is so power is decentralised.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

12 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rodney Croome is a spokesperson for Equality Tasmania and national advocacy group, just.equal. He who was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 2003 for his LGBTI advocacy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rodney Croome

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 12 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy