This latest decision by the EU is the first time the EU has acted to give teethto the political decision taken by the foreign ministers of the EU Member States at the EU Foreign Affairs Council of 10 December 2012 - which stated
all agreements between the State of Israel and the EU must unequivocally and explicitly indicate their inapplicability to the territories occupied by Israel in 1967
The statement makes the EU intentions abundantly clear:
Advertisement
The purpose of these guidelines is to make a distinction between the State of Israel and the occupied territories when it comes to EU support.
In declaring that the EU does not recognise any claim to legality by Israel to sovereignty in the West Bank and East Jerusalem - the EU has purported topre-judge anddismiss Israel's territorial claims to such areas in direct contravention of a joint statement issued by the Quartet on 10 April 2002:
We reiterate that there is no military solution to the conflict and call on the parties to move towards a political resolution of their disputes based on UNSCR 242 and 338, and the principle of land for peace - which formed the basis for the Madrid Conference of 1991. We reaffirm our support for the objective expressed by President Bush and spelled out in UNSCR 1397, of two States, Israel and Palestine, living side-by-side within secure and recognized borders
The EU decision has acted to interfere in the determination of secure and recognized boundaries between Israel and Palestine by pre-empting that Israel has no claim to sovereignty in any part of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
The EU is free to pursue any policy it wants - but also must accept the responsibility for the fall - out and criticism that will inevitably follow.
Does the EU now take the gracious step and bow out of the Quartet due to this conflict of interest - or does it have to be told to go packing by the other members of the Quartet?
Advertisement
The EU clearly cannot be both judge and jury and the remaining three members of the Quartet must make that very clear immediately - if they themselves wish to retain any credibility and influence in resolving a satisfactory outcome to the Jewish- Arab conflict.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
23 posts so far.