Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Educational sexism in Queensland

By John Ridd - posted Friday, 26 April 2013


In terms of the cause of the evident sexist discrimination the 1992 results are interesting because we know that the maths/science results were unbiased but the overall OP was biased. Assessment in maths/science in those days was essentially all formal exams/tests; but the assignment fad had started to penetrate other subjects.

However by 2012 things had changed, assignments as opposed to formal examinations had spread to all subjects and sexism was clear and major in size.

In an earlier OLO article on this topic (Please look at the last page or so of that article) I referred to an old Parliamentary Inquiry Boys: getting it Right which pinned the blame for male educational weakness mainly on over verbosity. It is interesting to note that one of the recommendations from that Inquiry was: Assessment procedures for maths and sciences must as a first requirement, provide information about student’s knowledge, skills and achievement on the subject, and not be a de facto examination of students’ English comprehension and expression.

Advertisement

It is a measure of the overweening arrogance of Education theorists and organisations such as QSA that they not only ignore comments from the highest democratically elected body but continue on unmoved.

All the evidence points the same way: all assignments under any name must be eliminated throughout schooling in maths and science. They lower standards, encouraging bad science (verbosity is very bad science), reduce the number of experiments that are done and they are a part of the institutionalised sexism we see today.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

36 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Ridd taught and lectured in maths and physics in UK, Nigeria and Queensland. He co-authored a series of maths textbooks and after retirement worked for and was awarded a PhD, the topic being 'participation in rigorous maths and science.'

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Ridd

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Ridd
Article Tools
Comment 36 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy