Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Julie Bishop on loyalty

By Max Atkinson - posted Friday, 8 February 2013


A better understanding of the logic of principles, and how they differ from both rules and policies, has in recent years seen major advances in legal philosophy. There is now a wider understanding by lawyers and judges that legal principles have dimensions of both weight and point, which courts are duty-bound to take seriously; abstract legal principles are not (as held by a conventional and still popular theory) smokescreens for law-making judges. That idea has exercised a stranglehold on jurisprudence for decades and is still taken for granted by politicians, journalists, social theorists and others in public life. It is largely responsible for the failure of attempts to introduce a constitutional bill of rights, because no one has been able to meet the objection that it must be a licence for unelected judges to legislate social policy.

However that may be, the distinction between issues of principle and matters of party policy makes it possible to reconcile Burke’s views on the priority of conscience with the need for unity on policies which further the interests of the community; this is both possible and necessary because acting on conscience is, as has been argued in earlier papers, the only way to respect community values.

To return to Bishop’s theory; while the habit of appealing to conscience is crucial in the public life of a nation, the ideal is dishonoured when members vote on a matter of principle as instructed by the party, and when leaders refuse a ‘conscience’ vote on the same matters. It is ignored when members defer to a party for the sake of unity, or to party leaders for the sake of loyalty. Unity is expedient for parties but the cost to the nation - seen in the apology and the Iraq War - is too high; if politicians want to take seriously the values they profess they must, like Burke, act on their own judgment and conscience.

Advertisement

 

- - - oOo - - -

 

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Max Atkinson is a former senior lecturer of the Law School, University of Tasmania, with Interests in legal and moral philosophy, especially issues to do with rights, values, justice and punishment. He is an occasional contributor to the Tasmanian Times.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Max Atkinson

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Max Atkinson
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy