Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Value of Australian currency

By Ben Rees - posted Wednesday, 16 January 2013


Policy Options

Under the Australian Constitution, the Commonwealth Government has all the powers it requires to manage external policy, fiscal policy and monetary policy. Since 1983 though, national governments have abnegated their formal responsibilities and handed external policy to asset speculators. Monetary policy has been handed to an independent Reserve Bank. Only fiscal policy remains an arm of macroeconomic policy setting in most western economies. This has to change. For elected government to be accountable to the people, they must exercise authority across the three arms of economic policy setting: monetary, external, fiscal. Government accountability across all arms of economic management should be a right of any electorate in a modern democratic economy

Those who call for a simplistic lowering of nominal or real interest rates must provide policy solutions to these difficult policy questions discussed above. Because Australia pursues free trade policies, overseas investors in rural Australia provide an important source of capital inflow needed to cross subsidize a chronic current account deficit. It matters not why the money flows in, so long as it "plugs" the current account deficit and feeds the net income deficit "habit". To manage this will require tougher Foreign Investment Review Legislation and a change in economic philosophy

Policies to overcome the chronic current account deficit are well understood. They will be politically unpalatable in the contemporary free trade political environment. Such policies would have to be sold on a number of fronts:

Advertisement
  • Governments accountable to the people across all three arms of economic management
  • Monetary policy direction reclaimed by Treasurer and Parliament
  • RBA administer monetary policy on daily basis only
  • Cease cross subsidization of balance of payments accounts that distort resource allocation
  • Reduce import flows in the national defence interest to build a broad industrial base.
  • Reduce import flows to return Australia to historic full employment levels.
  • Reduce contemporary inefficient underutilisation of labour in Australia

Policy Instruments

Fiscal Policy

  • Tariffs as a revenue instrument to reduce PAYE and company taxes
  • Quotas and prohibitions used sparingly
  • By Laws reintroduced to exempt imports from duty that are not made in Australia
  • Penalty taxation on dividends flowing off shore directed to sovereign fund
  •  Fiscal policy to actively support rebuilding a broader industrial base

Monetary Policy

  • Monetary policy settings returned to Legislated RBA Charter
  • Percentage capital inflow deposited in Government sovereign fund
  •  Sovereign Fund used to purchase existing foreign owned assets
  • Quantitative easing program to fund major infrastructure.

The GFC changed the financial world that was structured during the 1980's and beyond ; and, with it the belief in independent central banking. Deregulated financial markets fed greed and encouraged the structuring of "shonky"financial systems. International central banks that oversaw financial system expansion now appear morally bankrupt. On the pretext of growth policy, they support public sector ponzi schemes that keep world financial markets living in the manner to which they became accustomed. Once quantitative easing stops, then financial markets become unstable again; and, the world stares down another 2008.

The difficulty is that contemporary political parties and business leaders are still dominated by those who earned their spurs during the deregulation frenzy of post 1983. These people stubbornly believe that a return to the policies of the 1980's will restore stability and prosperity. They are sadly misguided.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben Rees is both a farmer and a research economist. He has been a contributor to QUT research projects such as Rebuilding Rural Australia. Over the years he has been keynote and guest speaker at national and local rural meetings and conferences. Ben also participated in a 2004 Monash Farm Forum.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben Rees

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ben Rees
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy