Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Democratic deficit depends on your line of sight

By Mark Christensen - posted Wednesday, 31 October 2012


Why do we embrace democracy? Americans got behind it because they didn't want a regime controlled by the clergy or monarchy. But a counter-offensive wasn't sufficient. Progress requires conviction in positive concepts, something real and deliverable, not Jeffersonian ironies regarding self-evident truth and inalienable human rights. Like the rest of us, America has been pursuing its dreams of liberty, justice and happiness on the deluded proviso the supporting system would eventually bring them to fruition.

Instead of disabusing the nation of its two-hundred-year obsession with go-all-the-way politics, the President succumbed to the political power of the Washington Star Chamber he promised to make self-deprecating. Rather than elevating the political discourse from juvenile they're-worse-than-me narratives, Obama pandered to his polarised base with the fatuous "you didn't build that" meme and a commitment to save Big Bird.

Thus the lies, strife and disunity go on.

Advertisement

In secular society, diversity of opinion and free speech are cherished liberties – provided they don't blaspheme received orthodoxy relating to the welfare state, religious pluralism, sexual preference or unfettered immigration. Dim-witted conservatives are ridiculed for being social Darwinists, hateful and intolerant of Muslims and gays, while the likes of Bittman, honest and informed, are lionised as crusaders of truth and justice.

Of course, remote, angry Republicans are equally culpable, clinging to their guns and religion, bending the truth in the service of any agenda. But there's one vital difference, the quality that allows them to excuse their arrogance and ruthlessness. Self-centeredness is at least on the right side of the either-or choice. Something worth defending at any cost, including life itself.

In the absence of a courageous Democratic president, the right, somewhat ironically, becomes a much-need buffer preventing morally and intellectually confused liberals from using democracy to subjugate personal responsibility.

After the Aurora shootings in July, Mitt Romney claimed "changing the heart of the American people may well be what's essential", not introducing new gun laws. The New York Times slammedthe Republican nominee for not providing "a clue on how he plans to reach that heart", while other self-regarding experts mocked it as nonsense and a "word salad", a random syntax designed to give the impression of meaningfulness.

It would seem it's too much to expect smug political journalists to appreciate the unconditional and metaphysical goal towards which democracy tends. The society we all long for is one that has faith in its individuals to see the blinding good sense of working together, rather than resorting to the machine and its grand plans to reform the human heart.

The real disappointment is knowing that Barack Obama does get it. He is unique, the embodiment of personal triumph, the closest thing to evidence of the dream becoming real, Americans can expect.

Advertisement

I suppose we'll now just have to wait and see if the window has closed.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

8 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mark is a social and political commentator, with a background in economics. He also has an abiding interest in philosophy and theology, and is trying to write a book on the nature of reality. He blogs here.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mark Christensen

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 8 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy