Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How marriage equality was defeated in Tasmania

By Rodney Croome - posted Wednesday, 3 October 2012


He then went on to say that same-sex marriage will lead to same-sex surrogacy (which the Upper House voted to legalise a few weeks ago), polygamy (which is the sure sign of pre-existing bias against marriage equality), and “a stolen generation” of children (which is an even surer sign).

But unfortunately some MLCs couldn’t see the faults in Cox’s case because they seemed dazzled by his name.

In retrospect, it was at that point the fight for Wilkinson and several others was lost.

Advertisement

Herein lies a lesson for other states and territories moving toward marriage equality.

The Tasmanian Upper House is no longer the homophobic chamber it was when it obstinately blocked the decriminalisation of homosexuality in the 1990s.

Sure, some members showed a lack of empathy about how important this issue is for same-sex couples.

Some also showed a deep lack of confidence in Tasmania’s ability to take a leading role in the federation.

But there are no dogmatic Christian fundamentalists in the Upper House, and no haters.

To pull wavering Upper House members back from supporting a reform they aren’t naturally too worried about, opponents of reform exaggerated the constitutional risks associated with the issue.

Advertisement

In reality, there is no certainty there will be a High Court challenge to state same-sex marriage laws and less certainty they will be struck down.

But opponents of marriage equality ignored reality and created the illusion a strike-down is a foregone conclusion.

Then at the last minute they spiced this exaggerated risk with high costs and some big names.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Rodney Croome is a spokesperson for Equality Tasmania and national advocacy group, just.equal. He who was made a Member of the Order of Australia in 2003 for his LGBTI advocacy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Rodney Croome

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy