Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The dreadful dilemma over Iran

By Julie Bishop - posted Thursday, 16 August 2012


Israel detects more than a nuance in their respective positions which could be a highly relevant factor in their deliberations.

However, given the threat that a nuclear-armed Iran poses to Israel, it is more likely that the timing of any military strike will be driven by intelligence reports rather than the electoral timetable of its most important ally.

The likely fallout from an attack is considerable.

Advertisement

There would a major hit to the already fragile global economy that would be exponentially worse if Iran successfully mined the Strait of Hormuz and managed to damage Saudi oil export facilities.

Israel would face attack from Iran and from Hezbollah which is rumoured to have stockpiles of tens of thousands of shorter-range rockets.

It would face global condemnation and suffer economic hardship, least of all from the economic blow that it would inflict on Europe and the United States from skyrocketing prices for crude oil.

There is no doubt that Israeli leaders are aware of the risks.

They face a terrible dilemma of choosing what could be devastation in the wake of a strike or annihilation if Iran was to launch a nuclear attack.

All this could be avoided under the first scenario.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Julie Bishop is the Federal Member for Curtin, Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Julie Bishop

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Julie Bishop
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy