Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Productivity Commission and Gambling

By Colin Lamont - posted Monday, 15 November 1999


If clubs want a fountain out the front, which has no practical use and which does nothing for the bottom line of the annual report then that is the club's business. It is not for government to determine that this is not the most efficient use of available funds and that this therefore justifies taking more money in tax or abolishing mutuality any more than it is government's right to come to my home and tell me the way I slice meat for dinner is not the most efficient way to do so or that planting roses instead of tomatoes is not the most efficient use of my garden.

Nor is it acceptable for the economic rationalists to regard the subsidising of meals in clubs for their patrons as misuse of economic rents. There may be other consideration. Many pensioners are eating a decent meal once a day at affordable prices because others play poker machines. It may be that we should value that opportunity for the elderly more than we value profit. The problem with the rationalists is that they discount socio-moral questions that do not increase the bottom line. But when my two maiden aunts, in their 80's, are collected by a courtesy bus which takes them to a club where they have forged new friendships with people they would never otherwise have met; where they can enjoy sing-songs and bingo and laugh at a comedian and eat a three course meal for $3:50 instead of sitting at home eating vegemite and tomato sandwiches in front of the idiot box; I believe they have received something of value. That is social progress regardless of whether the purblind gnomes see it or not.

These casual observations are by no means meant to represent my long considered judgement of the Australian Productivity Commission report however there are a number of statements in that report that do cause me to stop and think whether the Commission report is to be respected as the final say (or perhaps epitaph) on gambling for the 1990's.

Advertisement

Or whether it is just another attempt by just one more body to research a complex and difficult area. My instinct on first reading certainly is to adopt the latter view.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Colin Lamont is a former MLA for South Brisbane and an early campaigner for tighter powers for police in domestic situations. Having spent a lifetime active in diverse areas of agenda setting and public policy he is currently completing his Ph.D. in Politics and Public Policy.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Colin Lamont
Related Links
Queensland Licensed Clubs Association
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy