Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The Kimberley land grab is back on

By Wade Freeman - posted Wednesday, 11 April 2012


Remember the film The Castle? The Kerrigan family’s idyllic suburban lifestyle is threatened when a property developer compulsorily acquires their property.  Well, a long way from the suburbs of Melbourne, on the spectacular red coastline of the Kimberley in WA, a similar process is taking place right now. Only this one is fact, not celluloid fiction.

There was little fanfare or public comment when W.A Premier Colin Barnett recently re-issued ‘Notices of Intention’ to take on lands between Quandong and James Price Point, 60km north of Broome, despite the land being located on the pristine and National Heritage listed Kimberley coastline. This major legal event passed quietly on 12th March 2012.

It may be the key underpinning the transfer of lands from Indigenous Traditional Owners to Woodside Petroleum.

Advertisement

First the back-story. Last December the W.A. government's prior 'compulsory acquisition' notices on the lands around James Price Point were ruled invalid as they did not properly describe the area of land the State Government wanted to acquire. As it currently stands, even with new compulsory acquisition notice, the proposed gas hub at James Price Point is on shaky ground at best.

There is still no formal sign off from the State or Federal governments. The W.A. Environmental Protection Agency has delayed the release of their environmental assessment, and the final investment decision from chief proponent Woodside has been delayed to possibly mid 2013. Buyers for the gas are still not committed. On site ground works and surveys are well behind schedule and the opposition in the local town of Broome is growing louder.

On top of this Woodside is selling down its share in the Browse Basin project and the joint venture partners in the project are not committed to the James Prices Point location but would favor piping south to the Pilbara to existing gas processing facilities.

Despite all this and seemingly against all commonsense, Premier Colin Barnett is pushing ahead with the proposed location at James Price point. Premier Barnett has ignored advice from Commercial Barrister Michael Orlov who represented Traditional Owners Philip and Joseph Roe and Neil McKenzie.  

Following the Supreme Court challenge that ruled out the original compulsory acquisition notices on the 6th December 2011, Mr Orlov explained the complications for the Barnett Government affecting the negotiation process and the agreement struck with Traditional Owners.

The States agreement with the Traditional Owners needed to be premised on the W.A. State Government having the valid compulsory acquisition notices to commence negotiations on an agreement to use the James Prices Point site.

Advertisement

As this case has illustrated, the State had no legal compulsory notices and as such no legal standing, no procedural rights and no right to negotiate, according to Barrister Orlov. The action of the Supreme Court in ruling the notices invalid meant it is as if they never existed.

Tenure security and an agreement of Traditional Owners is also required before a final investment decision can be taken by Woodside and the joint venture partners and now the existing agreement is potentially open to legal challenge.

It means the agreements the W.A. Government has struck with the Kimberley Land Council on behalf of the Traditional Owners are now in question. The decision puts the future of the entire Browse gas project in doubt.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Article edited by Jo Coghlan.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Wade Freeman is Kimberley Project Officer for ACF and a long time Broome and Kimberley local. He has many years experience working and living in remote locations such as Mulan Aboriginal Community, Tanami Desert and Oecusse, East Timor. Wade is a post grad in Community Development at Murdoch University.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Wade Freeman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Wade Freeman
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Deals from Sponsor
Flipit.com Australia
Photobook Australia voucher code: Get 56% off on all products
Get $10 off all Singapore packages at iVenture card using this coupon code
Use this Native Box coupon code to get 12% off a $104 spend
Use this Mosmann voucher code to get 25% off on your Christmas presents
Use this ClearlyContacts coupon code to get two pairs of frames for $99
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy