Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

How to make every Australian Count: financing disability needs

By Jessica Malnersic - posted Wednesday, 5 October 2011


If a tax isn't the right way to fund the NDIS then what is the best way to proceed? The second option recommended by the Productivity Commission is the most feasible solution. It is not unreasonable to believe that the government could manageably afford it.

Supporters of 'Every Australian Counts', NDIS advocate groups argue that only $6.5 billion more will be needed from the $380 billion budget available to the federal government. This being the case, the government would only need to make small adjustments in the budget to ensure funding for the NDIS was secured.

While the costs of the scheme are high, it is up to government to balance its commitments to society as a whole. This is a key function of any government. Knowing that we have an aging population the government has not created a new tax to pay for it. It is and will remain to be funded by government. The same should be applied to the development of disability policy.

Advertisement

In our current environment where individuals envision every new tax as a direct threat to their monetary security, it seems absurd why one would propose a tax solution to a social policy issue if government has the means to fund it. If a tax system would have an adverse effect on those it seeks to benefit, why not leave the funding of the NDIS up to government?

Government obligations to all of society, including the old and the disabled, means economic outlays from general revenue should be made available to fund the NDIS.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jessica Malnersic studies at the University of New South Wales and is a member of the New South Wales Young Labor Exectuvie.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy