Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Why so many corpses?

By David Fisher - posted Tuesday, 4 October 2011


Defenders of Marxism claim that Marxist theory has nothing to do with the deaths. Terry Eagletonwrote In Praise of Marx. From his essay:

The truth is that Marx was no more responsible for the monstrous oppression of the communist world than Jesus was responsible for the Inquisition.

However, Eagleton doesn’t mention what was responsible for the deaths. Most people grant that the Holocaust was no accident. It was simply Nazi ideology in practice.

Advertisement

If one reads a basic Marxist document, The Communist Manifesto written by Engels and Marx, one can find a recipe for corpse making.

The Manifesto sets up a struggle between good and evil:

Bourgeois and Proletarians

The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.

Humans have fought and cooperated in many forms as they worked together for common goals or competed for resources. To put all these actions in the context of class struggle is unjustified reductionism. However, the bourgeoisie becomes the enemy of the ‘noble’ proletariat. ‘Bourgeoisie’ in practice becomes an inclusive term. It embodies the ‘class enemy.’ The class enemy can be anyone who opposes either the Marxist state or communist domination. It can be a peasant who works harder and as a result accumulates more than the other peasants. Stalin called them kulaks and purged them. It can be a person who opens an auto or bicycle repair shop. Castro called such people cockroach capitalists. It could be a person whose father owned or managed a factory. Such a person could be condemned for ‘unsuitable class origins.’ It is an elastic category which gives the party or the state justification for persecution.

After a condemnation of bourgeois society the Manifesto specifies ten measures of a new society which may differ in different countries. Some follow:

Advertisement

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

Home ownership is out. One has a residence at the sufferance of the state.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

133 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Fisher is an old man fascinated by the ecological implications of language, sex and mathematics.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Fisher

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Fisher
Article Tools
Comment 133 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy