Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The march of democracy in Southeast Asia

By Jessica Brown - posted Tuesday, 20 September 2011


Across the border in Singapore, the PAP's Tony Tan was sworn in as President a fortnight ago. He won by the narrowest of margins, just beating out a former PAP politician campaigning on a platform of more transparent government. In a sign of the growing divisions within the party and the electorate, this was the first presidential poll since 1993 (the first time it was held) to be contested by more than one candidate.

In the May general election, the PAP won 60% of the votes. While this would be considered a landslide in Australia, it actually represented a 6.5% swing away from the party and its worst result since independence in 1965.

These are small steps, but they are nevertheless significant. In a region known for its stellar economic growth, the path from development to democracy has been uneven at best.

Advertisement

Singapore's first Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew famously maintained that Asian people preferred soft authoritarian 'Asian values' to the individual freedoms espoused by the West.

John Lee pointed out back in 2008 that China's economic modernisation had not led to widespread democratic demands. The well off, well educated middle class had increased rapidly in size. But these nouveau riche preferred party membership to political franchise.

Once seen as Southeast Asia's greatest hopes for democracy, coup-ridden Thailand and the Philippines have seen political freedoms decline over the last decade.

But other large Asian countries have bucked the trend. In Japan and South Korea, the first Asian 'tigers', democracy has been remarkably resilient. Indonesia, just over a decade ago an authoritarian stronghold, has transformed into a vibrant (if messy) democracy. Now it seems that liberal democracy is a real (if perhaps distant) possibility in Malaysia and Singapore too.

Writing in the influential journal Foreign Affairs in 2009, Ronald Inglehart and Christian Welzel argued that economic "modernization does not automatically lead to democracy. Rather, it, in the long run, brings social and cultural changes that make democratization increasingly probable."

Malaysians and Singaporeans, now well accustomed to economic growth and development, are slowly beginning to demand political freedoms too.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Jessica Brown is a Policy Analyst at the Centre for Independent Studies.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Jessica Brown

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy