Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The ugly side of resource development

By Ben Rees - posted Tuesday, 10 May 2011


 

Household Final Consumption Expenditure

Year

Food percentage

1949/50

24.40%

1969/70

19.00%

1989/90

15.10%

2009/10

11.10%

Structural reforms of rural industries of the1980's and 1990's sought to overcome Engel's Law through international competition, efficiency and productivity improvements. Serious policy failure has been the result.

Advertisement

In December 2005, Bill Pritchard wrote:

During the 1960's and 1970's there was a seismic shift in the intellectual environment of - agricultural economists. The discipline - became more centred on the influence of the Chicago School paradigm. By the 1980's these views had inculcated key policy arenas within the Australian Government

Prichard  International Journal of Agriculture and Food – Vol. 13 (20 Dec. 2005

Milton Friedman's modern monetarism became the genesis of structural reform of Australian agricultural.

Post 1980's rural policy concentrated upon the top 20%-25% of farmers producing 70% of production. Data analysed above, confirms failure of not only rural policy; but also, Friedman's' economic philosophy. As Australia moves toward becoming a net importer of food, the threat of emerging Australian food insecurity brings into sharp focus the need to dramatically change rural policy; and, policy recognition must move beyond its narrow focus upon a hand full of farmers to embrace the other 75% - 80% of farmers producing the final 30% of production.

The fragility of rural Australia depicted in the above statistics compounded by the resources boom property market failure has produced a toxic alchemist's mixture within regional Australia. The ability of rural industries to pay reasonable real wages sufficient to attract labour to agricultural regions is non- existent. Meanwhile, cashed up mining and exploration companies poach qualified tradesmen be they town or farm based. To date 457 visas have provided a temporary solution. This suits Australian industrial policy pushing Friedman's natural rate of unemployment as the full employment definition at 4.5%-5% unemployed. Under a deregulated labour market, migration to maintain a labour supply sufficiently ahead of demand becomes an important policy direction to manage wage push inflation.

Advertisement

The shortage of tradesmen in Australia be they in rural or urban areas is a hangover from the high unemployment levels of the 1980's and 1990's. In those times industry did not have to train apprentices, they simply rang the CES and pulled tradesmen off the unemployment heap. As labour supply tightened, it was inevitable that tradesmen would become in short supply. A business culture of expecting unemployed tradesmen on tap has now evolved into a strident demand that skilled labour should be waiting the pleasure of business. Industry demands that either the taxpayer train workers or they must use 457 visas. This culture has to be addressed at Commonwealth policy level.

These policy problems lie within the province of the Commonwealth Budget strategy. Solutions will require abandonment of Friedman's economic philosophy and a return to the economics J. M. Keynes. Whilst Governments and commentators claim GFC policy response was a return to the economics of J.M Keynes, it was not. The GFC expenditure strategy was quintessentially nineteenth century classical economics. Consider the template below from a nineteenth century classical economist, J.S Mills, interpreting Say's Law of Markets commonly referred to as supply creates demand.

Could we suddenly double the productive powers of the country, we should double the supply of commodities in every market; but we should by the same stroke double the purchasing power. Everybody would bring double the demand as well as supply; everybody would be able to buy twice as much, because every one would have twice as much to offer in exchange

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben Rees is both a farmer and a research economist. He has been a contributor to QUT research projects such as Rebuilding Rural Australia. Over the years he has been keynote and guest speaker at national and local rural meetings and conferences. Ben also participated in a 2004 Monash Farm Forum.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben Rees

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ben Rees
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy