Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Lights off: Part III

By Kellie Tranter - posted Thursday, 13 January 2011


This article follows on from Part I and Part II.

It's fairly obvious from this brief historical conspectus that privatisation is an agenda that's been force fed by the self interested to NSW Labor governments over the last 15 years, and swallowed wholeheartedly. Even Blind Freddy could see that proper consideration has not been given to viable, sustainable long-term alternatives like solar energy.

And if the boobs in Macquarie Street can only be transfixed by the siren song of the Wall Street players, what about paying a little attention to what Warren Buffett's "senior" associate, Charlie Munger of Berkshire Hathaway, has said about the future of solar energy.

Advertisement

But no, not in New South Wales: if it's clean, renewable and socially and environmentally responsible, let’s axe it. Pardon? Given the prevailing mentality I guess it's only natural that such a commodity should actually be blamed for rising electricity bills!

What the government also fails to trot out are figures to show us how special deals for large users of electricity add to our quarterly bills? How many of those large energy users are on negotiated, guaranteed fixed prices for their electricity, at rates which mean they’re effectively subsidised by householders? Are we given details of those users and their effect on the system's capacity? Oh no, we can't disclose information like that: it's "commercial in confidence"!

NSW started with very positive schemes to encourage alternative energy sources, but those of us who install solar panels from now on receive only 20c per kwh to feed energy back into the grid, whereas those whose installations occurred between Jan 1 and October get 60c kwh for seven years. And the gloomy prediction from the big side of town is that paying for those already receiving 60c kwh will add an extra 10% to bills, on top of increases of up to 16% consumers will be facing anyway! They don't mention that 20c is much less than the conventional payment of a little over 40c per kwh, and no plausible reason has been given for such a complete about-face

Giles Parkinson of the Climate Spectator has written a detailed and informed series of articles about NSW’s Solar Scheme.

If one were to take a cynical approach one might think the scrapping of the NSW Solar Scheme was somehow connected to and contingent on the electricity sale proceeding

Advertisement

But just look at what is happening on the solar front notwithstanding our government’s best efforts.

Innovation

2008 data for Australian households indicates that 67% used spatial cooling and 77% used spatial heating. Spatial heating/cooling comprises 41% of household energy costs. Water heating accounts for 24% and other appliances about 13%. Plasma televisions consume almost three times more power than older versions.

We have already read about the development of extremely efficient solar-powered air-conditioning systems that will not only lighten the load on the mains transmissions grid, but also address the huge amount of greenhouse gas emissions generated by the use of air conditioners. It won’t be long before systems like that are on the market here, whether Australian made or from China.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Kellie Tranter is a lawyer and human rights activist. You can follow her on Twitter @KellieTranter

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Kellie Tranter

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Kellie Tranter
Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy