Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Don't bash the banks - take them over

By John Passant - posted Thursday, 4 November 2010


The banks' profits are untouchable. This is as true for Labor as it is for the Liberals.

Is there an alternative? We could push for a rent tax on the banks' super profits. But that is small bickies. It leaves in place the structures of exploitation and the ongoing attempts by the banks to maximise their profits..

Nationalise the banks under workers' control so all the community benefit.

Advertisement

State support and a quasi monopoly of the big 4 banks put the banks in a strong position to grab an extra share of surplus.

So while the banks are particularly hated (since they impact directly on most working people) their gouging merely reflects the feeding frenzy of all the bourgeoisie on the profit we create.

Why not nationalise the banks and use their profits for socially useful spending? The case for nationalisation? Ken Henry put it this way in relation to mining companies.

"Public production allows the government to control exploration and production expenditure, but may lower the return to the community if public enterprise is less efficient at resource exploration and production due to a lack of expertise and market discipline."

Substitute banking for resources and the point remains the same. In fact given the failure of the banking sector during the GFC the onus should be on banks to show that public ownership wouldn't be more efficient.

To paraphrase Henry, public ownership allows the government to control finance, and will increase the return to the community if the public enterprise is under bank workers' control.

Advertisement

Add in the profits from the other Big 4 banks and a real resource rent tax and we have a good basis for addressing climate change, closing the gender pay gap, ending aboriginal disadvantage, building public housing to end homelessness, fixing public transport, ending the hospital queues, improving education outcomes and paying better wages to the workers in those industries, for example.

None of this will happen because this is asociety that puts profit before people. It's time to turn society on its head and put people before profits. Nationalising the banks under workers' control would be a good first step in doing that.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

This article was first published on En Passant on November 2, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

28 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Passant is a Canberra writer (www.enpassant.com.au) and member of Socialist Alternative.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Passant

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Passant
Article Tools
Comment 28 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy