Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Tackling poverty: Time for fresh thinking and a look at the evidence

By John Falzon and Sally Cowling - posted Wednesday, 20 October 2010


Pearson says that the ‘capabilities approach’ of Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen has been a critical influence on his thinking. Sen argues that the state should support its citizens to develop capabilities such as good health, literacy, and the ability to participate in community life so that each person can lead a life they value. 

Like Pearson, we believe there is an urgent need to assist those among us who are poor or struggling to develop their capabilities. However, we believe that Sen’s framework leads to a more nuanced and compassionate approach to public policy and that Pearson’s prescriptions for those who are ‘irresponsible’ are inconsistent with Sen’s vision.

Sen is circumspect about the power of unfettered self interest to drive personal and social change. He stresses the need for governments to invest in education, health, nutrition, literacy, social support and social security programs to tackle inequalities of capabilities. But Sen also demands that we give thought to how we work with those in need. Do our interventions and supports promote human agency? Do they empower people so they can lead a life they value? At no point in Sen’s work does he suggest that paternalistic and punitive welfare policies provide an incentive to change harmful behaviour.

Advertisement

A first principle for good public policy is that the solution to a problem must follow from its conditions or causes. In Anti-Poverty Week it is vital that, faithful to the tried and true rather than the tired and ideological, we abandon the approaches that hinge on the “close supervision of the poor”. It is time to invest our energies and resources in policies that respect, listen to and empower those who have been pushed to the edges of the lucky country.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

An edited version of this paper was published as an opinion piece in the Sydney Morning Herald on October 18, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Dr John Falzon is Chief Executive Officer of the National Council of Australia St Vincent de Paul Society.

Sally Cowling is Manager Research and Program Development, UnitingCare Children, Young People and Families.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by John Falzon
All articles by Sally Cowling

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy