Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Ten Native Title Predictions

By Bryan Horrigan - posted Thursday, 15 April 1999


The ninth prediction is that the upcoming 1999 referendum on changing to a republic and changing the Constitution's preamble is unlikely to address some of the most crucial issues concerning recognition of Indigenous rights in the preamble. To the extent that any proposed preamble simply contains a merely factual acknowledgment of prior occupancy of the Australian continent by Indigenous people and little else, the real debates about Indigenous issues - appropriate constitutional recognition of Indigenous rights, use of the "races" power, self-determination, reconciliation, compensation, etc - remain on the political sidelines.

The significance of the preamble's mention of Indigenous people is that an appropriate amendment to the preamble on Indigenous rights, in combination with constitutional recognition for that to be used by High Court judges to interpret the remainder of the Constitution, might produce a different judicial view of the scope of the "races" power, for example, and hence a different political legal result in terms of judging whether the Constitution permits the Commonwealth Parliament to pass laws which are disadvantageous to any degree for Indigenous people. That would be of significance for any constitutional challenge to the Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth).

In 1997, the High Court seemed to think in Kruger that the Constitution offered little redress or protection for members of the so-called "Stolen Generation". In early March 1999, the battle for recognition and compensation for the Stolen Generation continues in a Federal Court hearing involving non-constitutional claims against the government of unlawful conduct, breach of statutory duty, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligence. If only half of the events relating to this matter in Robert Manne's article in The Courier-Mail on 3 March 1999 (at page 9) are recorded correctly, the incapacity of the Constitution (and maybe other laws) to prevent such treatment and compensate for it is a source of moral and political as well as legal criticism, and maybe even a catalyst for constitutional and legal reform.

Advertisement

The tenth and final prediction is that how we - you and I, and the High Court, and John Howard, Kim Beazley, Peter Beattie, and others - reconcile principled treatment of commercial interests and principled treatment of native title interests is what Australians at the end of the 21st century will judge us by when they decide whether or not we were a community of principle, committed to fair and just treatment of Indigenous and non-Indigenous interests alike.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This is a short extract from a presentation by Associate Professor Bryan Horrigan, at a free public seminar on native title conducted by the Faculty of Law in the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) on Wednesday 24 February 1999 at the Queensland Parliamentary Annexe, as part of a QUT Community Service initiative. The last part of his presentation focused upon predictions for the future.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Professor Bryan Horrigan studied at Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar and now works at the University of Canberra, where he is Director of the National Centre for Corporate Law and Policy Research and Deputy Director of the National Institute for Governance. He is the author of Adventures in Law and Justice - Exploring Big Legal Issues in Everyday Life.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Bryan Horrigan
Photo of Bryan Horrigan
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy