Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Education policy and motherhood statements

By John Töns - posted Wednesday, 18 August 2010


A re-elected Gillard Labor Government will develop a national online assessment and learning bank for students, parents and teachers to provide a sophisticated diagnostic assessment of each student’s strengths and learning needs.

Sounds good does it not? The result will be exactly what teachers have feared - namely that education will be defined in terms of what can be tested. A student can be literate yet not understand the layers of meaning embedded in both literary and non literary texts; a student can be numerate yet unable to recognise when to use those skills to solve particular problems. While diagnostic tests have their place there is the real danger that they become a substitute for critically evaluating learning programs.

For years teachers have been grappling with the question of error analysis. For example what would you do if a student, when asked to solve this problem 5 x 4 = ? gives the answer 9? Most would assume that the student has mistaken the “x” sign for the “+” sign - in which case the answer is not wrong - the student understands what 5 + 4 is but there may be other problems with distinguishing between a multiplication sign and an addition sign.

Advertisement

Diagnostic tests have a place but the Gillard government, like Howard’s before it, is too keen to invest too much credence in diagnostic tests as a means of understanding what is happening in schools. In particular we should treat the statement that, “Digital technologies make it possible to accurately assess each student’s performance and provide feedback on which aspects of their learning they need to develop” with a great deal of informed scepticism. This blind faith in technological solutions fails to appreciate that somewhere in the system are fallible humans who can make mistakes in entering data, and create poorly designed tests.

Once governments become locked into funding schools on the basis of such a blind faith in technology it will create more problems than it solves.

A re-elected Gillard Labor Government will implement Australia’s first national system of performance assessment and pay to reward the very best classroom teachers.

Teacher quality: all policies speak about the need of ensuring that we have high quality teachers. Labor’s idea of paying a bonus for outstanding performance suggests that they still have not liberated themselves from the folly of economic rationalism. It perpetuates the myth that people are motivated solely by financial considerations. Teachers are no different to anyone else in the workforce; money is an important consideration but not the only consideration. People who are naturally inclined to do shoddy work will not suddenly do wonderful work because there is a financial incentive, similarly those who have always done wonderful work will not suddenly work any harder because of a financial incentive.

This is not to say that we need to give consideration to teacher incomes. Here are some of the things that could improve the quality of teaching:

A commonwealth funded pay increase of 15 per cent with the following conditions: teachers pay to be structured so that every 5th year they are required to take leave on full pay. This can be funded by abolishing long service leave and by the 15 per cent increase - in other words the take home pay will not change other than they will have one year in every five where they can take leave on full pay. The sabbatical year can be used to undertake post graduate qualifications or just paint the house.

Advertisement

Given the shortage of students undertaking science and mathematics at year 12 level there is a desperate need to encourage graduates in science and mathematics to enter the teaching force. Since the various political parties are so beholden to economic rationalism why not set the wages of teachers to reflect the principles of supply and demand?

Respect expertise: the Australian education system, like its British counterpart, has an ingrained bias towards academic education. One of the consequences has been the rebadging of technical or vocational courses as university programs. This in turn has led to defining the value of a particular degree in terms of employment outcomes. At least here Labor is on the right path with the establishment of trade centres. But if those centres become identified as somehow less prestigious to university oriented programs they will have failed. We need to develop a culture of respect for trade qualifications such as one finds in Germany.

Overseas students: some may remember the Colombo Plan. It was essentially designed to provide quality education to overseas students in our geographic area who would otherwise be denied access to tertiary education. Over the years this form of foreign aid has morphed into a program for full fee paying overseas students. Universities have become dependent on overseas students as a revenue stream without it they would cease to be viable. Tertiary education has become an export industry - yet one does not hear any voices of concern from the political parties that our universities may be becoming too dependent on overseas students. Nor is there any concern about the way some private VET programs appear to have been established with little interest other than taking advantage of full fee paying students.

Conclusion

An examination of education policies highlights that there is little appreciation of the way existing policies are frustrating the vision that all political parties seem to share. We want top quality education but prefer to invest in gimmicks because providing the sort of quality education this country needs is deemed too expensive. This is reflected in our solution to skill shortages - the majority of skills shortages are a product of shortcomings in education and industrial relations yet we solve it by simply importing the skills.

By encouraging skilled migration the shortcomings in the education system with respect to meeting Australia’s skill needs is disguised and so we can continue to indulge ourselves with gimmicks that do little to change the fundamental shortcomings in our education system.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Töns is President of the Zero Carbon Network a network established to promote clear thinking about the issues associated with climate change. In addition to operating the only zero carbon boarding kennels in South Australia he is also completing a PhD at Flinders University in the area of Global Justice. John is a founding member of a new political party Stop Population Growth Now.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Töns

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy