Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Population gold

By Dilan Thampapillai - posted Thursday, 5 August 2010


Gillard has made the right noises on increasing participation in higher education, which is one path to a middle class life, but the progress thus far has been incremental. Moreover, a scorecard for secondary schools was all well and good but it just confirmed what everybody knew anyway. My parents, and those of my classmates, didn’t need a scorecard to tell them that sending their children to elite private schools was a good idea. Better pay and conditions for public school teachers might have helped. Though, I’m sure that the builders enjoyed the recent funding blowout in the Education Revolution.

Changing Tony Burke’s job title to the Minister for Sustainable Population is just window dressing. If Australia’s population will rise anyway from 22 million to 36 million by 2050 then we may as well face up to that fact and think about how best to deal with it. This would mean looking sensibly at infrastructure and at expanding cities or at developing regional cities.

We might need to start thinking about distribution rather than concentration, and about making better use of urban spaces. Protecting the environment and increasing the population are not automatically in conflict. It’s the way in which the environment is treated that matters. It would make sense to invest in environmentally friendly technology. Funnily enough, all of that requires a taxpayer base and since the mining companies seem reluctant to pay a fair share that just leaves us ordinary citizens.

Advertisement

This brings us back to that uncomfortable evening in 2004 when Julia Gillard and Mark Latham announced the Medicare Gold policy. In the shocked silence that followed those of us with about 40 working years left, started to calculate the weight of the increased tax burden. It didn’t take a genius to figure out that free health care for the over-75s would be subsidised by those of us who were working. It also doesn’t take a genius to figure out that the environment, infrastructure and an ageing population, requires somebody to pay for it. We need to think hard about that and not close the door on hardworking migrants. If not, we might as well re-title Wayne Swan as the Minister for a Sustainable Taxpayer Base.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

42 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dilan Thampapillai is a lecturer with the College of Law at the Australian National University. These are his personal views.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Dilan Thampapillai

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Dilan Thampapillai
Article Tools
Comment 42 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy