Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Relations between drug companies and doctors need clearer boundaries

By Paul Komesaroff - posted Tuesday, 30 December 2003


Specific measures are recommended to ensure that interactions between doctors and drug companies are consistent with the public interest. Gifts should be accepted only if decision-making is left manifestly unimpaired. Support for travel to conferences organised by professional societies should be restricted to people making formal contributions. Entertainment expenses should not be lavish. Access of representatives to students and health services should be limited. Sponsorship of meetings should be provided only through independently organised scientific committees and speakers should indicate dualities of interest at the time of presentation. Sources of commercial funding should not influence the scientific, educational or public policy decisions of professional bodies, which should not associate themselves directly or indirectly with promotion of products of commercial sponsors.

Additional steps should be taken to minimise biases in research and publication, which require action not only by individual practitioners but also by the industry, government and academia.

It is important that the community is able to have confidence in the independence of medical practitioners and researchers. To guarantee this, significant changes are needed, which will entail a substantial cultural shift and no doubt take some time to realise fully.

Advertisement

The process will not be without pain. However, the outcome will, it is hoped, offer the best of both possible worlds: a rigorous, independent and critical profession in partnership with a productive, creative industry serving the needs of the community.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Age on December 18, 2003.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Paul Komesaroff is director of the Monash Centre for the Study of Ethics in Medicine and Society, and ethics convener of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Related Links
Faculty of Medicine, Monash University
Royal Australasian College of Physicians
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy