Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Rent tax is as absurd as its predecessor

By Alan Moran - posted Friday, 16 July 2010


This dooms the MRRT. Miners will quietly divert capital to places with more accommodating tax regimes, the bureaucracy will duly inform the government, which, also anxious about constitutional challenges from Western Australia, will discreetly drop the whole proposal. Unlike the RSPT, the death of the MRRT will therefore not follow a humiliating capitulation by the government.

The proposed tax changes have foundered on the shoals of demand, supply and competition. Demand and supply has led to a doubling of coal and iron ore prices in the past year or so. But analysts (whose guesses are better informed than most) expect prices to subside to their previous levels in the coming years, even if China continues to boom. This is because no firm has a monopoly on mining skills and technology continues to offset the increasing costs of accessing new deposits.

With the RSPT, a costly policy error was made. Rudd has paid with his political career. So far Swan, the chief propagator, and Henry, the chief strategist, have shown themselves to be indifferent to the costs - probably billions of dollars - of their incompetence in proposing the tax.

Advertisement

This is understandable with Swan, a politician with the hide of a rhinoceros. But Henry has done a massive disservice. He has presided over the debauchment of Treasury. His poorly thought-through mining tax was accompanied by deceptive estimates of its revenue effects. This follows other actions in promoting fiscal irresponsibility, including the response to the GFC and inventing data that put a rich gloss on the adverse repercussions of a carbon tax.

The suspicion is these mistakes are more than errors of judgment and stem from a contempt for the market system and a hubristic wish to reconstruct it. Either way, he and others of similar mind who are in positions of influence within the Treasury should be dismissed as a step towards repairing confidence in the department.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian on July 14, 2010.

Advertisement
 Institute of Public Affairs Advertisement

 

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Alan Moran is the principle of Regulatory Economics.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Alan Moran

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Alan Moran
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Institute of Public Affairs
 No reality holiday from this population challenge
 For budgets only smaller is tougher
 Government subsidies to green groups must end
 Boot-strapping on a carbon tax
 West's history not complete without reference to Christianity
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy