Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Tyranny by treaty

By Teresa Platt - posted Monday, 28 June 2010


Bad policy or grand theft?

Project #1901 was not built in response to free market principles. It was built in response to a nonsensical global political policy. The UN climate change treaty created this top-down “mitigation” policy. It’s bad policy, bad global “governance”. And, if the UN gets its dream of taxes on international travel and trade, it will officially be a global government, without any accountability whatsoever - a corrupt politician’s dream world.

In President Obama’s speech to the climate change meeting in Copenhagen, he pushed for: “Mitigation. Transparency. And financing.”

“Mitigation”: tax dollars will be transferred to projects no one wants with UN technocrats charging fees certifying companies providing nonsensical mitigation for trumped up issues hyped by propaganda campaigns.

Advertisement

“Transparency”: online databases will bury agency fees and outrageous paperwork costs - $38,000 a page! - for tons of UN treaty-mandated reports that no one will ever read.

“And financing”: the UN and World Bank will transfer your taxes to opportunists around the globe.

All this socialism is simply not sustainable. All this “green” for all these “green” jobs comes at the expense of blue and purple and orange jobs. Our government institutions are building an elaborate Potemkin village with money taxed out of the pockets of waitresses and truck drivers, farmers, fishermen and office workers.

“Mitigation. Transparency. And financing.”

Fraud.

As the line from The Godfather goes, “A lawyer with his briefcase can steal more than a hundred men with guns”. It’s obvious that, if you throw in a few PhD’s and a treaty or two, it’s possible to raid the treasuries of the developed world without ever firing a shot.

Advertisement

So, about that 2009 UN climate change meeting in Copenhagen, let’s ask that question again: “Did they really all have to go?”

In Bangladesh, China and India, at the World Bank and the UN, the answer is, “Yes! Yes! Yes!”

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

This is an abridged version of Teresa Platt’s  report. For the full version visit www.teresaplatt.com.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

The daughter of an agricultural banker, Teresa Platt has been involved in food and fiber production for over three decades. Teresa has experience in marketing and management, public relations and government affairs. To learn more, google “Teresa Platt” or visit her on Facebook. Teresa blogs at www.teresaplatt.com and you can reach her in California at TeresaPlatt.com@gmail.com

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy