Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Ayaan Hirsi Ali - no stranger to controversy

By Shakira Hussein - posted Friday, 25 June 2010


Despite her frequently stated atheism, Hirsi Ali also believes that the Christian churches have an important role to play in the battle against Islam. She regards both fundamentalist Christians and Christians who would “appease Islam” (by participating in interfaith dialogue) as “a liability to Western civilisation”, unlike Christians who stand firm against Islam while sharing the message of a tolerant and loving God.

Nomad must be the only book ever to carry an endorsement from Richard Dawkins on the cover and a call within its pages for the Vatican to more actively evangelise.

Hirsi Ali explains this strange juxtaposition by saying there are many Muslims who instinctively recoil from the violence of bin Laden, but are not yet ready to face the idea of a world without God.

Advertisement

Christians should show that their religion offers a preferable (if equally delusional) placebo.

Hirsi Ali makes clear that her call for assimilation into Western civilisation is not confined to Muslims. Australian readers will recognise many parallels with the rhetoric surrounding the federal intervention into indigenous communities and indeed, Hirsi Ali lists “Aboriginals” alongside Afghanis, Somalis, Arabs, and Native Americans as “non-Western groups [who] have to make the transition to
modernity”.

Her discussion of race in America is also likely to raise hackles: for example, her proclamation that “all black people” should read The Bell Curve, which argues that socioeconomic disparity in the US can be explained by genetic differences in intelligence.

Just as most Muslims will reject Hirsi Ali's portrayal of their religious community, many non-Muslims will take issue with her portrayal of the Enlightenment not to mention multiculturalism, feminism, and the Archbishop of Canterbury. Hirsi Ali's journey is not through the clash of civilisations: she is experiencing the clash within civilisations, Islamic and Western.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian in June 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Shakira Hussein is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Melbourne specialising in Muslim women, gendered violence and racism.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Shakira Hussein

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy