Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Kevin Rudd has failed his own test on climate change

By Owen Pascoe - posted Friday, 30 April 2010


Arguments can be made about whether emissions trading or a carbon tax is the best mechanism, however what is crucial is having a strong price signal.

The evidence points to sooner, rather later, being the best time to get a price on carbon started. Treasury’s massive modelling exercise in 2008 concluded “delaying action increases the risks and costs on achieving any given environmental goal”.

The Australian Business Roundtable on Climate Change, which included BP, Origin and Westpac, found “the longer we delay acting, the more expensive it becomes for business and for the wider Australian economy”.

Advertisement

Kevin Rudd has diminished business certainty with his hastily made announcement to delay the ETS.

Investments in clean energy will be shelved. Even investments in polluting industries will face the uncertainty of a radically different and hopefully stronger carbon price being enacted over the next few years.

Oil and gas producer Santos has confirmed it will not proceed with a proposed $800 million gas-fired power plant in Victoria while there is uncertainty about a carbon price. The Australian newspaper has called it an “investment strike” in power generation.

Of course while our economy and environment would be better off if we got started now with a serious price on carbon, some industries see a delay to the ETS as a big win.

The corks will be popping in the top floor offices of high carbon polluting businesses that have done little to diversify because, for them, delay is victory.

Last May’s announcement of a one-year delay to the start of the CPRS and a fixed price of $10 a tonne meant the six most polluting industries avoided paying $1.1 billion for the pollution they pump into the atmosphere, according to analysis by RiskMetrics for the Australian Conservation Foundation.

Advertisement

This further two year delay will mean companies like Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton will avoid paying millions for their pollution, which damages the atmosphere for all of us.

Meanwhile our economy suffers the costs and increased risks of delay.

Delaying serious action on climate change is a weak, in fact cowardly, decision that is not founded on any evidence and will increase business un-certainty.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

38 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Owen Pascoe is a climate change campaigner at the Australian Conservation Foundation.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 38 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy