Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here’s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

John Harborne

John Harborne is a retired investigative metallurgist. He was employed by the steel wire manufacturing subsidiary of BHP Co. P/L at Newcastle, NSW, for 46 years. He holds a BSc in metallurgy from the University of NSW and a BA (double majors in French) from the University of Newcastle. He is affiliated with the Institution of Engineers Australia (MIEAust, CPEng) and the Institute of Materials Engineering Australasia (IMEA). He was very active on 14 technical committees of Standards Australia for 20 years, representing both BHP and IMEA, positions he relinquished only in early 2008.

He has become a fervent climate change sceptic, insofar as he believes that anthropogenic carbon dioxide has insignificant influence on global warming. This belief is reinforced by the fact that, despite the huge amount of funds expended on research over the past 20 years, no one has yet been able to produce irrefutable proof of the pretended link between CO2 increase and average global temperatures.

He became interested in global warming “science” through CCS (CO2 geosequestration) when the proposed process came to the fore only a few years ago. Through his academic training in metallurgy he quickly realised that experts in the field were not divulging physical data on the transition from coal to CO2 storage.


‘Clean coal’ process is not so clean cut
Environment - 16/01/2009 - 48 comments
Advertisement



About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy